Transit lines are life blood

Greening the Empire State: Exploring New York's Energy Options

Transit Lines are Life Blood
Baruch School of Public Affairs
Gotham Gazette
Topics / Voting / This Month's Article
Voting Newsletter
Sign up for our monthly Voting newsletter:

First Name:

Last Name:

Email:


Plain-text HTML
Signup to this list's RSS feed

The Topic
Voting refers to the processes through which candidates appeal to the citizenry, and the citizenry chooses who among those candidates will represent them. Elections, campaigns, the voting process (voting machines, etc.) are all involved in voting.
The Context
By and large, New Yorkers don't vote. Though the number of registered voters who turn out on election day has fluctuated, the overall trend has been downward. Fewer people voted in 1997 than in 1953, though the number of registered voters rose by more than a million (never mind how many more were eligible). After the debacle in Florida during the 2000 presidential election, federal legislation was passed to reform the voting process nationwide. Little has changed in New York.
Espada Never Registered Campaign Committee

State Legislators Plan to Fight on Term Limits
Sen. Kevin Parker, a Brooklyn Democrat and outspoken critic of the mayor, plans to file a bill on Friday that would effectively stop Mayor Michael Bloomberg and other city lawmakers from seeking third terms without winning approval from city voters in a referendum. A week ago, Assemblymember Hakeem Jeffries, another Brooklyn Democrat, filed the same legislation in the Assembly. While bills are routinely circulated in Albany only to disappear into the legislative ether, both of these bills appear to be gaining momentum. The leaders of both chambers have said they would allow the legislation to advance.
Possibilities for Bloomberg's Third Term
Political observers and current and former administration officials to say there is almost certainly to be some kind of “PlaNYC 2035”—a big, over the top initiative that cuts across city agencies and consumes most of the oxygen of the next few years if Mayor Michael Bloomberg is reelected.
Boyland Begins Move to Retake Mealy's Old Seat
When Councilmember Darlene Mealy flip-flopped and voted for Mayor Michael Bloomberg's term-limits extension, she not only left herself open to criticism but also to an ironic political challenge. Tracy Boyland, whose seat Mealy captured three years ago running as an alternative to the Boyland machine, is reportedly eying her old office. And whether or not she will face Mealy in that race remains an open question.
Bloomberg Visiting Democratic County Chairs
Mayor Michael Bloomberg, a Democrat-turned-Republican-turned independent who has yet to say which ballot line(s) he'll seek for his 2009 re-election bid, has paid homage to two different Democratic county chairman over the past 24 hours. The mayor only needs to receive approval from three of the city's five Democratic county leaders in order to compete in the party's primary in 2009.
Eyes on City Hall: A Young Man's Education in New York Political Warfare
by Evan J. Mandery, Fran Reiter

Power Failure: New York City Politics and Policy Since 1960
by Charles Brecher, Raymond Horton, Robert A. Cropf (Contributor), Dean Michael Mead

The Napoleon of New York: Mayor Fiorello LaGuardia
by H. Paul Jeffers

Type Size: A A
printer friendly format

email this article

most emailed articles
digg this
stumble it
del.icio.us

Ballot-Bumping, NYC's Bloodsport

by Doug Israel and Matthew Gertz
July 2005

It is easy to express outrage against the system by which candidates in New York gather signatures from the public on "nominating petitions" in order to get on the ballot – and then are kicked off the ballot when their opponents challenge those petitions on legal technicalities.

Attorney General Eliot Spitzer expressed outrage in 2001, when his office issued a report (in pdf format) that concluded “New York State has the most confusing, stringent and needless petition requirements for ballot access.”

Mayor Michael Bloomberg expressed outrage in 2004. “It’s become a whole cottage industry...you don’t have to beat the other guy based on positions or your ability to serve, all you gotta do is beat him because you got a better lawyer who can get him thrown off the ballot,” Bloomberg said. "I think it's time to end this 'gotcha' kind of technique, where lawyers comb petitions to find some technical violation."

Why the system persists might be explained by the news from Bloomberg’s campaign, shortly after the deadline for filing the petitions this month, that Michael Bloomberg would be challenging the signatures in the nominating petitions of Republican rival Thomas Ognibene, reportedly “hoping to keep Ognibene off the ballot and avoid a GOP primary.” Yes, the same Michael Bloomberg, just eight months later.

"In New York, politics is a blood sport," said election lawyer Henry Berger. (See “Ballot Bumping In New York”)

Gathering Signatures

Running for virtually any political office in the country requires demonstrating some form of citizen support in order to protect the ballot from being flooded with frivolous candidacies. In New York, this support is established by gathering signatures from registered voters in the district in which the candidate is running.

The New York election laws that require candidates to collect signatures dates back to the late 19th century, when they were first implemented in an attempt to break the control political parties had over the nomination process. Before their implementation, the only way candidates could get on the ballot was by receiving the support of the party machine.

The new laws were meant to allow a way for insurgent candidates to run for office.

Today the law requires candidates running for citywide office to collect 7,500 signatures within a span of 37 days. Borough-wide candidates need to collect 4,000 and City Council candidates need 900.

Rather than ensuring that those without the support of the machine can still seek office, these laws wind up restricting the options that voters have when they go to the ballot box on Election Day.

An Unnecessary Obstacle?

New York is one of only 13 states to set a petition requirement as the sole means of getting on the ballot; most states allow candidates to pay a filing fee in lieu of accumulating signatures. New York also allows the shortest period of time in which to gather those signatures, a mere 37 days, compared to the more than a year allowed in Michigan, and the unlimited time period in six other states, including New Jersey.

And the number of signatures required to get on a ballot in New York is way out of line with other states: In California, to get on the ballot even for governor requires only 65 signatures.

What the larger signature requirement often shows is not how much actual citizen support candidates have, but how much money they have to pay people to gather the signatures.

In search of larger and larger total signature numbers, many candidates find themselves eventually employing paid petitioners to hawk their candidacy. Of the major mayoral candidates, only Anthony Weiner employed an entirely volunteer, grassroots effort. He cites the superiority of this approach, claiming that paid petitioners are “mercenaries, whereas the people who collect our petitions are very animated about our campaign.”

Those with the backing of the local party organizations and labor unions typically have a huge advantage in the process. Those without such endorsements need to build their own field operation to gather the signatures, or roll up their sleeves and collect them themselves.

For incumbents and established politicos, reaching the threshold is often not a problem. The difference between the 40,000 signatures that Anthony Weiner gathered and the 158,000 that Gifford Miller’s operation gathered is more or less meaningless to the process.

However, for insurgent candidates in municipal races these petitions are deadly serious; the slightest errors in their compilation could lead to the would-be officeholder being stricken from the ballot.

The Signature Challenge

“Its absurd to me,” exclaimed Gur Tsabar, a candidate running for City Council in the second district, which includes the Lower East Side, during a press conference he called to blast the ballot-bumping there. “Political clubs are deciding who will appear on the ballot, not the residents of the district.”

By law, any candidate or any voter from the district or political jurisdiction may challenge a candidate’s petition signatures, claiming that, for one reason or another, the signatures are not valid. Incumbent office holders and candidates with party backing have seized on this process to mount challenges as a way to minimize and marginalize competition. With little oversight or compelling reason not to mount a challenge, well-financed and/or party-backed candidates throw up this obstacle as a matter of habit. They know that if a challenge is mounted their opponent must waste precious dollars and time defending themselves to the Board of Elections, and potentially in court; time and money better spent campaigning for office.

As is the case in the second council district, local party organizations often use this process to flex their political muscle, challenging candidates who oppose them. Six of the 11 candidates running for the open city council seat vacated by the term-limited Margarita Lopez are being challenged by the ironically-named Coalition for a District Alternative (CoDA), a political club that actively supports both Margarita Lopez and Lopez protégé Rosie Mendez, who is running to be her successor.

If the Board of Elections confirms that the defendants’ signatures are not valid, for reasons as slight as the omission of a zip code or a forgotten date at the top of the sheet, the entire page of signatures is removed from the candidate’s count. (This is actually an improvement from the even more stringent requirements of the 1980s, which found signatures invalid if “street” or “avenue” were abbreviated.) If the final count falls below the minimum threshold, the candidate’s candidacy is over before it begins.

During the last municipal election, dozens of city council candidates were kicked off the ballot following petition challenges. Expect more of the same this year.

Doug Israel is the public policy director of Citizens Union Foundation, where Matthew Gertz is an intern.

Related Articles

The Campaign Tangle Series from 2001

The Campaign Tangle Begins, by Bob Liff

Campaign Tangle 2: Timeline For The Legal Tango By Henry Berger and Kimberly Strobl

Campaign Tangle III: A City Of Challenges

Campaign Tangle IV: The Rejected

Campaign Tangle 5: Chaos and Confusion

• Campaign Tangle 6: Welcome To Brooklyn

• Campaign Tangle 7: The Disillusioned Candidates

• Ballot-Bumping in New York (an Issue of the Week in August, 2003)

A Brief History of Election Law in New York

Other Related Articles:
City Council Approves Term Limits Extension (2008-10-24)

A New Push to Let Non-Citizens Vote (2008-09-29)

2008 Primary Results (2008-09-10)

In Queens, a Race to Control the Senate (2008-08-11)

Reinforcing Voting's Front Line (2008-05-29)

Signs of a Sea Change In Voting (2008-02-21)

Guide for the Last Minute Voter (2007-09-17)

September 18, 2007 Primary Election Results (2007-09-19)

React to this article on our Voting Message Board.

Visit the complete Topic Archives

Sites of Interest from Collegester:
Online Casino | Wireless broadband | Place Your Link Here!