The Times Wants Congestion Pricing
March 26th, 2006

An editorial today in the New York Times calls on New York City to follow the example of London and institute congestion pricing — charging daytime drivers a fee for entering the central business district. London has seen a drop of nearly one-third in vehicle traffic. Gridlock can be measured in appointments missed, tardiness, environmental damage and even elevated blood pressure, the Times editorial observes. Taking a third of the vehicles off New York’s most heavily used streets can’t hurt.

The editorial cites by name the study conducted by Bruce Schaller, Gotham Gazettes transportation topic page writer, on the effects of such a plan in New York City. For details, see Schallers March update
Congestion Pricing, and an earlier Issue of the Week by Gail Robinson, Endless Traffic: Can It End?

By on March 26, 2006, 4:41 pm
In category: Transportation | 4 Comments »

| More

RSS Feed RSS Feed


4 Responses to “The Times Wants Congestion Pricing”

  1. Larry Littlefield Says:
    March 27th, 2006 at 7:58 am

    In this case I agree with the Times.

    Once again, however, the people who matter are those whose interests are served — in this case those who drive to Manhattan AND would not be willing to pay for a faster commute. That is, the political class, who get free on-street permit parking.

  2. Glenn Says:
    March 27th, 2006 at 1:31 pm

    Congestion pricing should be part of a coordinated plan to reduce all non-essential traffic, starting with all the governmental employees that get free parking permits from the city. There should be a top to bottom review and a goal set of 50% reduction in the number of permits. Other ideas would be to charge for all street parking in the CBD. It would also help a lot if we switched all the surface bus lines over to Bus Rapid Transit or streetcars or any way of dedicating a lane of traffic to high volume vehicles over single occupant vehicles.

  3. Trffc Says:
    March 29th, 2006 at 9:30 am

    The city needs to sell the idea of tolled East River Bridges with a tax break for the masses. Once the city collects a toll on its bridges, it can better afford to drop its portion of the clothing sales tax, and to finance improved transit without further tax increases.

    If the city doesn’t have the backbone to charge cars for crossing the “free” East River Bridges in the immediate future, perhaps we can start with charging trucks and commercial vehicles.

  4. Ginette Pergerson Says:
    October 9th, 2010 at 7:19 pm

    Hey! I surfed this article and found it to be pretty interesting but your code wouldn’t completely load. It only seemed to load about 25% of the page. Are you aware of this?

    Anywho, I don’t completely agree with all that I’ve read so far from a dubstep genre perspective, but I’ll come back later to see if everything is fixed to finish reading.

Gotham Gazette the Place for Politics and Policy

Gotham Gazette is published by Citizens Union Foundation and is made possible by support from the Robert Sterling Clark Foundation, the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation, the Altman Foundation,the Fund for the City of New York and donors to Citizens Union Foundation. Please consider supporting Citizens Union Foundation's public education programs. Critical early support to Gotham Gazette was provided by the Charles H. Revson Foundation, Rockefeller Brothers Fund and the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation.

RSS Feed