May 26, 2012 · www.gothamgazette.com

Gotham Gazette
Loading
Archive for September, 2006
Recent Posts
NYC Blogs
Click here for a list of NYC blogs
Newsfeeds
Search This Blog

The Disabled Vote (Though Are Still Largely Disenfranchised)
September 15th, 2006

On Primary Day, 580 New Yorkers voted using the 22 new accessible voting machines, some of whom voted independently for the first time in their lives, according to ReformNY, a blog by the Brennan Center for Social Justice. There were a few glitches, but the bigger problem was that handicapped voters were forced to travel such long distances to vote on the accessible machines. There’s no telling how many people were disenfranchised as a result, but it probably easily numbers in the thousands. It’s a shame that New York’s disabled voters bear the brunt of the State’s failure to comply with a federal mandate in a timely manner.
(For more on the machines, see this post from Albany Matters)

But if the New York State legislature really is (as the Brennan Center argued in a report a couple of years ago) the most dysfunctional in the nation, at least New Yorks system of voting (for these dysfunctional legislators) is not apparently among 11 of America’s worst places to cast a ballot (or try)

By Jonathan Mandell on September 15, 2006, 6:21 am
In category: Albany, Electoral Politics, Gotham City, Governing | No Comments »

| More

RSS Feed RSS Feed


Where Your Money Goes (An Itemized List)
September 14th, 2006

The State Assembly released information on $52 million it is spending in member items yesterday, spread over 2,675 pages of pdf file. Good government group Common Cause compressed the file into a spreadsheet to make it easier (read: possible) to make sense of. The average grant was $19,500, with the maximum being $4,912,000.

“Sadly, despite the obvious inadequacies and deficiencies of this most recent release, it actually represents more information than the public typically receives about this type of spending,” Common Cause writes on its blog.

The Village Voice blog lists the top ten recipients and shows much pork ended up in the city.

For more on this subject, see the Albany Matters blog post from this morning, Who’s Giving $170 Million To What? Can’t Tell You!

By Joshua Brustein on September 14, 2006, 3:35 pm
In category: Albany, Electoral Politics, Gotham City, Public Finance | 3 Comments »

| More

RSS Feed RSS Feed


No Singing, So No Conceding
September 14th, 2006

The Daily Politics points out that several candidates in close races have not yet conceded their races. These include the following Democratic primary races:

Hiram Monserrate, in the race for state senate in District 13 (Corona, Jackson Heights, East Elmhurst) apparently won by incumbent John Sabini.

Ada Smith, an incumbent, in her race to keep her state senate seat in District 10 (Jamaica), which was apparently won by challenger Shirley Huntley

Sylvia Friedman in the race to keep her state assembly seat in District 74 (Downtown and Eastside of Manhattan) apparently won by challenger Brian Kavanagh.

Ari Kagan in his race against apparent winner Alec Brook-Krasny for the state assembly seat for District 46 (Bay Ridge, Brighton Beach, Coney Island, Dyker Heights, Marlboro, Sea Gate): Democratic primary

(For more details about these contests, check out Contested State Senate Seats and Contested State Assembly Seats)

Jerry SKurnik points out in the comments section of the blog post that concessions are almost as meaningless as calls for recounts (since the Board of Elections automatically recounts). If a candidate concedes and then the final canvass shows he or she received more votes, they still win even though the conceded. A concession at this stage means the loser knows they lost be a big enough margin that going to court is futile.

By Jonathan Mandell on September 14, 2006, 12:21 pm
In category: Albany, Electoral Politics, Gotham City, Governing | No Comments »

| More

RSS Feed RSS Feed


Election Observations
September 14th, 2006

The city’s newspapers and blogs have had a day to digest the primary results and a day of general election campaigning to observe. Here’s some of what they noticed:

The New York Sun reaches several conclusions from the primary results: “The New York Times matters less than it did. Democrats are moving to the center. And homeowners are voting their economic interests. And we don’t doubt that the last trend is a cause contributing to the first two.”

On Room 8, Jerry Skurnik advises readers that Tuesday’s results are unofficial — and so those unhappy with the results of very close races should wait for the official count before demanding a recount.

‘In the next week or two, the Board of Elections will conduct the official count by recording the numbers off the machines and counting the paper ballots,” he writes. “Nobody has to demand this.”

The immediate nastiness in the races for governor and attorney general didn’t go unnoticed. Apparently Attorney General candidates Andrew Cuomo and Jeanine Pirro want to shred each other, and
the families of gubernatorial candidates Eliot Spitzer and John Faso are already fair game.

Really, men, settle down!” Gothamist urges after a day of negative campaigning.

By Joshua Brustein on September 14, 2006, 8:31 am
In category: Electoral Politics, Gotham City | No Comments »

| More

RSS Feed RSS Feed


Who’s Giving $170 Million To What? Can’t Tell You!
September 14th, 2006

Every year, $170 million gets doled out to New York State’s legislators to spend as they see fit. The appropriations, called member items, are generally awarded to community groups and non-profits, but have come under heavy criticism for their lack of transparency.

Yesterday, the Assembly released its list of what projects will receive the funds, but it does not include the names of the legislators that sponsor each project. The Times Union has sued to release the names, but the Legislature, represented by Attorney GeneralElliot Spitzer, has argued that the Freedom of Information Law, which allows the public to demand certain documents from the government, does not provide for such a request. The minority parties in both houses have voluntarily released the information.

The Times Union editorial board has said this obliqueness of the distribution of millions of dollars can lead to seedy activity. They point out that the West Bronx Neighborhood Association – the non-profit that State Senator Efrain Gonzalez of the Bronx has just been indicted over for directing $37,000 from it for personal expenses, such as Yankees tickets and vactions – has indirectly had money funneled to it from other non-profits that Gonzales issued money to through member items.

The non-profit is located in the same building as the Senator, has shared staff with Gonzales’ office, and is “identified by two sheets of white paper with its name that have been taped to the front door,” as described by the Times.

While the lawsuit plays out, some relevant legislation has been introduced in the Senate.

State Senator Liz Krueger, of Manhattan, introduced a bill that would provide for the full disclosure of the dispersal of discretionary funds. And Senate Minority Leader David Patterson has introduced a bill that would allow courts to “award attorney’s fees and other litigation costs when a government agency improperly denies or delays a [Freedom of Information]request.”

The city has been criticized over the transparency of its member items as well. Click here to find out for more.

By Mike Muller on September 14, 2006, 5:41 am
In category: Eye on Albany | 1 Comment »

| More

RSS Feed RSS Feed


The Little Races
September 13th, 2006

The result of yesterday’s primary between John Sabini and Hiram Monserrate to become the State Senator for the 13th Senate District in Queens seems too close to call. But Monserrate is guaranteed victory regardless: he crushed Edgar Moya in the race to become the male District Leader for the Democratic Leadership District 39 Part B.

If Monserrate ends up conceding defeat in the senate race, this will probably be a small consolation. It is a victory that will go almost completely unnoticed, securing him a job that few people understand or care about. As district leader, Monserrate will serve as the contact person for the Democratic Party in his district; one of his major responsibilities will be to recruit poll workers to work the next election.

While the big news yesterday was the race for federal and statewide offices, primary day is also time for the little races. Aside from district leaders, parties also chose their Delegates for Judicial Conventions (they’ll be in charge of formally choosing judges) and State Committee Members (who will vote at the party’s statewide political conventions).

You can find the results here.

By Joshua Brustein on September 13, 2006, 5:01 pm
In category: Electoral Politics, Gotham City | 2 Comments »

| More

RSS Feed RSS Feed


A Bizarre Incumbent in Queens Actually Gets The Boot
September 13th, 2006

As we’ve written before on this blog, incumbents with troubling backgrounds nevertheless tend to be re-elected. But in the case of Ada Smith, her little-known challenger, Shirley Huntley, has narrowly prevailed in Queens’ 10th Senate District.

Even with the controversy surrounding her, including throwing a cup of hot coffee into a staffer’s face and the ongoing investigation into accusations that she has hired no-show staff, Smith received the endorsement of the Queens Democratic Party – along with all of its accompanying benefits – as well as some major unions.

While the party chose to back her, the Queens Chronicle reported that no “leading politician” was willing to second it. And some District Leaders publicy bucked the party’s favorite and sided with Huntley, who also received the support of every paper that made an endorsement in the race.

Huntley didn’t harp on Smith’s background, and told the Times-Ledger, “Her track records speaks for itself. I don’t talk about her.”

Huntleyis reportedlyknown in her community as an activist, and served as a community school district president. Her priorities are improving the education system and expanding affordable housing for working families and she is wary of tax cuts, but acknowledges the prevalence of government waste.

By Mike Muller on September 13, 2006, 2:59 pm
In category: Eye on Albany | No Comments »

| More

RSS Feed RSS Feed


Winners and Losers in the 11th
September 13th, 2006

With the hotly contested, racially charged Democratic primary over, the New York Observer writes that it may not really have been about race after all: In the end, though, race was beside the point: It was Yvette Clarke –the only woman in a field of four who prevailed, with around 30 percent of the vote.

So if it wasnt about race, what was it about? And what does it mean, aside from the fact that Clarke is almost certainly going to Washington. (She faces Republican Stephen Finger on the GOP line and another Republican, Marianne Blume, running for the Conservative Party in a contest Congressional Quarterly rates as safe Democratic.)

Expanding on the idea that sex mattered, the Observer covers a campaign appearance where Clarke said, I cannot imagine a Congress that was half female allowing our children to be sent to war, into harms way without an extremely good reason….There are not enough women in Congress.

Clarke picked up on this theme in her victory speech last night when she hailed Shirley Chisholm, who represented the district and was the first black woman in Congress: She rewrote history, Clarke said. She was independent. She was brilliant.

Others cite labor union support as putting Clarke over the top. On WNYCs Brian Lehrer Show this morning, Village Voice writer Wayne Barrett said unions worked hard yesterday to get out the vote for Clarke.

Basil Smikle, a veteran political consultant, told the Post that Clarke simply had the momentum. “She was able to unite the Caribbean voters with the African-American voters and her momentum in the last moments put her over the top,” he said.

And the losers? Gowanus Lodge says opponents of Atlantic Yards cannot be cheered by the results in the 11th (and in other races as well) although it would be a mistake to read too much into the results. In the 11th, the blog points out, Chris Owens, a fervent opponent of the megaproject came in fourth out of four candidate.

Several people commenting on the Daily Politics see David Yassky, the one white candidate in the race to represent the predominantly black district, as the big loser. He campaigned tirelessly, moved into the district, and reportedly raised more than $1.3 million. But, one writer thinks that that venture ended any possibility of [his] seeking an office where non-white voters and endorsers matter. Another writer chimes in, David Yassky lost big. He spent a million bucks but how many votes did he manage to change between the day he announced his candidacy and yesterday?

For his part, Barrett looks to the third place showing of Carl Andrews, a longtime associate of former Brooklyn party boss Clarence Norman. Barrett, who repeatedly criticized politicians and other journalists for not taking Andrews to task for his ties to the convicted party leader, declared, A stake has been driven through the heart of the Clarence Norman machine.

By Gail Robinson on September 13, 2006, 11:26 am
In category: Electoral Politics, Gotham City | 1 Comment »

| More

RSS Feed RSS Feed


Spitzers Victory
September 13th, 2006

Eliot Spitzers resounding victory in yesterdays primary — and his lead in the polls over Republican John Faso reflect the fact that New Yorkers are fed up and looking for the candidate with the most promise to banish the Pataki-Silver-Bruno Axis of Feeble, that has ruled Albany, the Daily News says in its post-election editorial. But Spitzer is not governor yet. So between now and the November 7 general election, the paper calls for debates between the two candidates and for Spitzer to give more specifics on issues, such as how he will resolve the lawsuit over funding for the city schools and control the soaring cost of public employee pensions.

Appearing on WNYCs Brian Lehrer Show this morning, Village Voice columnist Wayne Barrett seemed awed by the sheer size of the Spitzer victory. In November, Barrett thinks, Spitzer could get the greatest mandate of any governor in our lifetime.

But Barrett sees a cloud — in the person of Andrew Cuomo who will share the Democratic ticket with Spitzer as the partys candidate for attorney general. Cuomo won his lopsided victory partly due to the support of Service Employees Union 1199, which represents health care workers. Cuomo owes those workers, but if Spitzer is elected, Barrett believes he must cut Medicaid spending, perhaps adversely affecting those same workers. The result? Spitzer and Cuomo. Barrett predicts, could be on a collision course.

By Gail Robinson on September 13, 2006, 10:43 am
In category: Albany, Electoral Politics, Gotham City, Health | No Comments »

| More

RSS Feed RSS Feed


Thanking Suozzi
September 13th, 2006

On Room 8, Larry Littlefield thanks Tom Suozzi for his unsuccessful gubernatorial campaign against Eliot Spitzer.

“Thank you for turning your back on the safe path of careerism, trading favors, waiting for the death or indictment of an incumbent, and occupying a seat,” he writes. “Thanks even more for taking on the disgrace our state government, once one of the best in the nation, has become. That was even harder, because it required that you not only call out the other side, but also your own side and its supporters. It made a lot of enemies, which has cost you. But from my point of view, they include many of the right enemies.”

By Joshua Brustein on September 13, 2006, 10:11 am
In category: Electoral Politics, Gotham City | No Comments »

| More

RSS Feed RSS Feed


Looking to November
September 13th, 2006

Primary day has come and gone (see the results here), and that means looking towards the general election. The Times Empire Zone blog has a post examing the compelling storylines that may develop — and decides that there is enough negative stuff floating around about Jeanine Pirro and Andrew Cuomo that the Attorney General’s race could get spicy quickly:

“Probably the most intriguing political question today, and probably in the days to come, centers on the most competitive of the races: How quickly will the Cuomo-Pirro battle for A.G. turn personal and nasty? Well have a good idea by mid-afternoon, it seems.”

By Joshua Brustein on September 13, 2006, 9:43 am
In category: Electoral Politics, Gotham City | No Comments »

| More

RSS Feed RSS Feed


Today’s Debut Of The New Voting Machines
September 12th, 2006

New York enters the beginning of a new era in voting today with voting machines at specific sites accross the city designed to be accessible for the disabled. The machines, Avante Vote-Trakkers, have large, shaped buttons and headphones for the blind, and a “puff sip” mechanism for those with motor function impairments. They are electronic, but do not tally votes. The actual ballot is printed on paper, put into a sealed envelope, and counted by hand. Voters did not need to identify themselves as disabled to use them.

(Click here for pictures.)

Some good government groups were worried because several counties around the state were telling voters that they needed to make an appointment to use the special machines. The state subsequently sent out notice to the counties that voters may vote by walk-in.

But the notice was too close to the primaries and not well publicized, said Neal Rosenstein of NYPIRG, which may have resulted in some voters staying home.

The Help America Vote Act, federal legislation passed after the 2000 Florida election debacle, mandated that all of the states’ voting machines be accessible to the disabled, among other things.

But New York was slow to act, and was the one of only two states sued by the Justice Department for non-compliance.

As a stop-gap measure, New York Citytoday hasfive of the new machines at one polling place inManhattan and at one polling place in Brooklyn, four such machines inthe Bronx, and three inStaten Island. The machines will only be used this year.

The counties across the state will choose new machines, from a list of certified(pdf format) vendors compiled by the state, for 2007.

.

By Mike Muller on September 12, 2006, 2:41 pm
In category: Eye on Albany | No Comments »

| More

RSS Feed RSS Feed


Primary Day
September 12th, 2006

By Jonathan Mandell on September 12, 2006, 12:35 pm
In category: Electoral Politics, Gotham City | No Comments »

| More

RSS Feed RSS Feed


Not Forgotten
September 11th, 2006

By Oates Ritthichai on September 11, 2006, 5:26 pm
In category: Gotham City | No Comments »

| More

RSS Feed RSS Feed


A Chance To Vote On Atlantic Yards
September 11th, 2006

The proposed Atlantic Yards development in Brooklyn has its supporters and its opponents, and even some people who support some aspects of the 22-acre project and oppose other aspects.

Voters in one political primary get to choose candidates who reflect each of these positions.

In the race most directly affected by the plan – the tough competition for the open seat in the 57th Assembly District, which resides in the footprint of the proposal – the three candidates have all taken different stances.

Bill Batson has been adamantly opposed to the project, and testified that he “must condemn virtually every aspect of the [developer's] proposal.”

In July, Hakim Jefferies told the Times, after being pressed, that he is “more inclined to support it than not,” in its current state. Given that statement, he has been criticized for his recent fliers that oppose the use of eminent domain for private interests, which is part of the plan.

And Freddie Hamilton is an ardent supporter who signed on to the Community Benefits Agreement between the developer and local constituents.

Newspaper endorsements, though, don’t necessarily align with the candidates’ positions on this one (albeit major) issue. Yes,the anti-Atlantic Yards local, the Brooklyn Papers, endorsed the anti-YardsBatson. But Courier-Life, a local chain of newspapersthat does not support the Atlantic Yards, did not endorsethe anti-Yards candidate Batson, calling him and Hamilton “polarizing.”Instead it ”wholeheartedly” endorsed Jeffries because of his nuanced view.

The New York Times and theDaily News, which bothsupport the project, did not endorse the adamantly pro-Yards Hamilton. Indeed, theTimes praised Batson for elevating the Atlantic Yards debate. But both the Times and the News endorsedJeffries.

By Mike Muller on September 11, 2006, 4:11 pm
In category: Eye on Albany | No Comments »

| More

RSS Feed RSS Feed


Reaction: New World Trade Center Towers
September 11th, 2006

As they marked the fifth anniversary of September 11th, some are also reacting to the newest buildings planned for Ground Zero.

An architecture review in todays New York Times called the plans for the three new towers solid, competent work, but criticized the city for its dubious planning of the site all along.

The designs unveiled last week for three sleek glass towers at Ground Zero rise above the mediocrity we have come to expect from a planning process driven by political opportunism, backdoor deal-making and commercial greed.

Gothamist said that the urgency and idealism” of the plans have faded after people became resigned to slowness of the process.

But some express optimism about the future. The New York Sun ran an editorial saying that the long awaited towers will mark a renaissance of development and commerce in the city.

Ground zero will return to the commercial roots of the city while also displaying the same architectural and engineering adventurousness that in earlier generations created the Empire State Building, the Brooklyn Bridge, Central Park, and the original World Trade Center, the Sun says.

By Josh Burd on September 11, 2006, 2:47 pm
In category: Gotham City | 1 Comment »

| More

RSS Feed RSS Feed


9/11 We Didnt Know What To Think
September 11th, 2006

In surely the first of many, many events today commemorating the anniversary of September 11th, music and prayers suffused the sunrise service at Wagner Park in Battery Park City, which began before dawn. We didnt know what we felt, we didnt know what to think, but we knew what to do, said Councilmember Alan Gerson, recalling that day five years ago. Friend helped friend, neighbor helped neighbor, stranger helped stranger.

The editorial pages of New Yorks newspapers are full of words marking the fifth anniversary of the terrorist attack on the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001:

New York Times: “The time when we felt drawn together, changed by the shock of what had occurred, lasted long beyond the funerals, ceremonies and promises never to forget. It was a time when the nation was waiting to find out what it was supposed to do, to be called to the task that would give special lasting meaning to the tragedy that it had endured. But the call never came.”

Daily News: Some day, we must take [the children born after 9/11], as they will take their children, to whatever memorial rises at Ground Zero and talk to them about the victims, ensuring that the dead are not just names read in a mournful roll call once a year.

New York Post: “David Hobbs was just eight when his dad, Thomas, perished. ‘I was in 3rd grade,’ David says. ‘I was just getting to know him.’…America hadn’t asked for war, but rose swiftly to the challenge when war came – all around the world. Is America winning that war? Mistakes have been made – indeed, the history of warfare is littered with mistakes. But there has been no second strike on America’s shores since that dreadful day five years ago.”

Newsday: “There is the war in Afghanistan, not resolved; the war in Iraq, not resolved; the war against Islamic fundamentalists, not resolved. But that is not what today is about.Today is a day to come together, to recall that even as we were ripped apart by those terrible events, we were also brought together…”

New York Sun ” Five years after finding itself at the epicenter of the deadliest terrorist attack in American history, New York is a vibrant city in the midst of a great renaissance.”

El Diario: “Five years later, the feelings are still raw and there is no real recovery from the impact of this terrorist act….[W]hat is the legacy of 9/11?… It is a legacy of heroic acts by normal New Yorkers. ”

AM New York: “We must transform a gaping hole into a place of meaning and affirmation, a hole not merely in the sacred ground of a city, but the hole that’s still in our hearts.” ( Dont Lose Sight of the 9/11 Museum by Alice M. Greenwald, the director of the World Trade Center Memorial Museum.)

By Jonathan Mandell on September 11, 2006, 8:27 am
In category: Gotham City | No Comments »

| More

RSS Feed RSS Feed


Attorney General Debate
September 8th, 2006

Andrew Cuomo, Mark Green, and Sean Maloney engaged in a final debate this week (sponsored by the New York City Bar Association and the New York Law Journal ) before Democratic voters in New York State go to the polls on Tuesday to choose one of them as the Democratic nominee for attorney general of the state.

All three candidates said their top priority was the rooting out of political corruption. Maloney listed his top three priorities for reform as investigating the state’s Public Authorities, following the pay to play trail, then reducing the cost of Medicaid by 25 percent by attacking fraud. Cuomo even said he would pursue government reform with the same zeal as Spitzer did with securities.

They all also agreed to continue Elliot Spitzer’s pursuit of the securities industry.

Both Green and Cuomo said that ensuring General Electric dredges the Hudson River will be their top environmental priority, and Maloney showed support for eminent domain, calling it a powerful tool that can be used to further environmental interests, but that in the hands of a “corrupt and sclerotic” government, it doesn’t get used correctly.

In order to protect children from predators on MySpace, Maloney said he wanted to force the social networking site to require the use of a credit card and proof of age. Republican Jeanine Pirro has made MySpace a big issue in her campaign.

While Green spent much of his time talking about his own record, at the end of the debate, the Village Voice reported he challenged Cuomo to answer three questions: Why did the Times call Cuomo’s 203(k) HUD mortgage program “a fiasco“; what about the Voice claims that Cuomo was cozy with a “slumlord”; and how about the suit by Spitzer and other attorneys general claiming that HUD wasn’t following a federal law to reduce pesticide use?

After the debate, Connecticut Attorney General, Richard Blumenthal, who had just endorsed Cuomo, and was part of the pesticide case, said the suit was aimed at the Bush Administration.

Earlier in the debate, Green attacked Cuomo for leaving the Manhattan District Attorney’s office before his required three years of service. Cuomo countered that his past years of public service were factored into that requirement. But the Daily Politics points out that part of that “public service” was his work on his father’s gubernatorial campaign.

By Mike Muller on September 8, 2006, 5:32 pm
In category: Eye on Albany | No Comments »

| More

RSS Feed RSS Feed


Inaccurate Flyers in the 25th Senate District
September 8th, 2006

The Brooklyn Papers, who have posted a primary election guide for the legislative seats around the Downtown area, has an an article, not yet published on their website, by Dana Rubenstein, who points out that comments on State Senator Martin Connor’s voting record and campaign contributions in mailings sent out by his challenger, Ken Diamondstone, are inaccurate.

One mailing says Connor received money from health insurance and drug companies and then voted for a bill that would have raised the amount of money an employee would have to pay before their insurance kicked in. But the article points out that Connor voted against the bill (and the amount of money he got from the companies was less than a third of what Diamondstone’s mailing had said.)

Diamondstone told the Papers that it would spend “an estimated $30,000″ mailing out corrections.

But Connor has also sent out mailings that fly in the face of recent court rulings, the article shows. He attempted to kick Diamondstone off the ballot by arguing that he didn’t live in the district long enough to qualify for a run for office, but the courts ruled in Diamondstone’s favor – yet Connor’s recent mailings repeat the charge.

(The Papers made no endorsement in this race.)

By Mike Muller on September 8, 2006, 1:39 pm
In category: Eye on Albany | No Comments »

| More

RSS Feed RSS Feed


A Day For Literacy
September 8th, 2006

Today, September 8th, is International Literacy Day, as designated by the United Nations . It is a good day to point out that there are 1.5 million adults in New York City more than a third of all adult New Yorkers! — who cannot read beyond the fifth grade level, according to Literacy Partners, which organizes classes for New Yorkers over the age of 16 to learn to read and write.

As much as 20 percent of the American workforce may be functionally illiterate and unable to read instructions, add and subtract or perform other basic job tasks, according to Susan McLean of Literacy Partners. The effect goes way beyond embarrassment and (frequently) impoverishment for individuals. American businesses lose an estimated $60 billion in productivity each year due to employees lack of basic skills, according to McLean, who adds the problem may only get worse: By 2020, some experts have calculated that there may be as many 14 million jobs in the United States that will go unfilled (at least unfilled by Americans), for lack of a sufficiently literate workforce.

By Jonathan Mandell on September 8, 2006, 12:39 pm
In category: Education, Gotham City | No Comments »

| More

RSS Feed RSS Feed



RSS Feed