Democratic Primary Results by Congressional District
February 6th, 2008

Sen. Hillary Clinton may have easily landed the popular vote yesterday, but Sen. Barack Obama still ended up with nearly 40 percent of the Empire State’s delegates. And in a race this close — where a clear nominee may not be apparent for weeks, maybe months — every convention seat filled will count.

In total, Clinton landed 140 delegates and Obama won 92, according to the latest figures from the State Democratic Committee. After the jump is a breakdown for all of New York City’s congressional districts via the committee.

The breakdown shows weaknesses in Clinton’s organization here, and where Obama was able to make up the difference. Obama even won several districts, including Yvette Clark’s in Brooklyn, which spans Crown Heights, Park Slope and Brownsville – much of the area where Obama campers were seen hoisting signs and distributing campaign literature over the weekend.

He also crept up on Clinton in Charles Rangel’s district in Harlem, where the Obama chorus seemed to strike a nerve.

Gary Ackerman, 5th CD, Queens and Nassau
Clinton: 72.3 percent
Obama: 27.7 percent

Yvette Clarke, 11th CD, Kings
Clinton: 44.2 percent
Obama: 55.8 percent

Joseph Crowley, 7th CD, Bronx and Queens
Clinton: 62.7 percent
Obama: 37.3 percent

Eliot Engel, 17th CD, Bronx, Rockland, Westchester
Clinton: 53.6 percent
Obama: 46.4 percent

Vito Fossella, 13th CD, Kings and Richmond
Clinton: 64.4 percent
Obama: 35.5 percent

Carolyn Maloney, 14th CD, New York and Queens
Clinton: 57.4 percent
Obama: 42.5 percent

Gregory Meeks, 6th CD, Queens
Clinton: 44.2 percent
Obama: 55.8 percent

Jerrold Nadler, 8th CD, Kings and New York
Clinton: 57.3 percent
Obama: 42.7 percent

Charles Rangel, 15th CD, New York and Queens
Clinton: 53.8 percent
Obama: 46.2 percent

Jos Serrano, 16th CD, Bronx
Clinton: 68.5 percent
Obama: 31.4 percent

Edolphus Towns, 10th CD, Kings
Clinton: 42 percent
Obama: 58 percent

Nydia Velzquez, 12th CD, Kings, New York, Queens
Clinton: 64.8 percent
Obama: 35.2 percent

Anthony Weiner, 9th CD, Kings and Queens
Clinton: 72.2 percent
Obama: 27.8 percent

By on February 6, 2008, 3:35 pm
In category: Gotham City,Governing | 8 Comments »

| More

RSS Feed RSS Feed


8 Responses to “Democratic Primary Results by Congressional District”

  1. jax Says:
    February 6th, 2008 at 9:13 pm

    where do I fidn breakdown of results – % & delegate count for district 27 new york state for democrats

  2. Courtney Gross Says:
    February 6th, 2008 at 10:05 pm

    Jax- if you click the committee link above it will take you to the delegate breakdown for every CD.

  3. James Gambone Says:
    February 6th, 2008 at 10:09 pm

    I am trying to find a breakdown of the Puero Rican vote in the New York primary. Can anyone help me?

  4. FOR THE LOVE OUR COUNTRY Says:
    February 7th, 2008 at 4:58 pm

    Obama’s speech (October, 2002):

    Good afternoon. Let me begin by saying that although this has been billed as an anti-war rally, I stand before you as someone who is not opposed to war in all circumstances.

    The Civil War was one of the bloodiest in history, and yet it was only through the crucible of the sword, the sacrifice of multitudes, that we could begin to perfect this union, and drive the scourge of slavery from our soil. I don’t oppose all wars.

    My grandfather signed up for a war the day after Pearl Harbor was bombed, fought in Patton’s army. He saw the dead and dying across the fields of Europe; he heard the stories of fellow troops who first entered Auschwitz and Treblinka. He fought in the name of a larger freedom, part of that arsenal of democracy that triumphed over evil, and he did not fight in vain.

    I don’t oppose all wars.

    After September 11th, after witnessing the carnage and destruction, the dust and the tears, I supported this Administration’s pledge to hunt down and root out those who would slaughter innocents in the name of intolerance, and I would willingly take up arms myself to prevent such a tragedy from happening again.

    I don’t oppose all wars. And I know that in this crowd today, there is no shortage of patriots, or of patriotism. What I am opposed to is a dumb war. What I am opposed to is a rash war. What I am opposed to is the cynical attempt by Richard Perle and Paul Wolfowitz and other arm-chair, weekend warriors in this Administration to shove their own ideological agendas down our throats, irrespective of the costs in lives lost and in hardships borne.

    What I am opposed to is the attempt by political hacks like Karl Rove to distract us from a rise in the uninsured, a rise in the poverty rate, a drop in the median income – to distract us from corporate scandals and a stock market that has just gone through the worst month since the Great Depression.

    That’s what I’m opposed to. A dumb war. A rash war. A war based not on reason but on passion, not on principle but on politics.

    Now let me be clear – I suffer no illusions about Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal man. A ruthless man. A man who butchers his own people to secure his own power. He has repeatedly defied UN resolutions, thwarted UN inspection teams, developed chemical and biological weapons, and coveted nuclear capacity.

    He’s a bad guy. The world, and the Iraqi people, would be better off without him.

    But I also know that Saddam poses no imminent and direct threat to the United States, or to his neighbors, that the Iraqi economy is in shambles, that the Iraqi military a fraction of its former strength, and that in concert with the international community he can be contained until, in the way of all petty dictators, he falls away into the dustbin of history.

    I know that even a successful war against Iraq will require a US occupation of undetermined length, at undetermined cost, with undetermined consequences. I know that an invasion of Iraq without a clear rationale and without strong international support will only fan the flames of the Middle East, and encourage the worst, rather than best, impulses of the Arab world, and strengthen the recruitment arm of al-Qaeda.

    I am not opposed to all wars. I’m opposed to dumb wars.

    So for those of us who seek a more just and secure world for our children, let us send a clear message to the president today. You want a fight, President Bush? Let’s finish the fight with Bin Laden and al-Qaeda, through effective, coordinated intelligence, and a shutting down of the financial networks that support terrorism, and a homeland security program that involves more than color-coded warnings.

    You want a fight, President Bush? Let’s fight to make sure that the UN inspectors can do their work, and that we vigorously enforce a non-proliferation treaty, and that former enemies and current allies like Russia safeguard and ultimately eliminate their stores of nuclear material, and that nations like Pakistan and India never use the terrible weapons already in their possession, and that the arms merchants in our own country stop feeding the countless wars that rage across the globe.

    You want a fight, President Bush? Let’s fight to make sure our so-called allies in the Middle East, the Saudis and the Egyptians, stop oppressing their own people, and suppressing dissent, and tolerating corruption and inequality, and mismanaging their economies so that their youth grow up without education, without prospects, without hope, the ready recruits of terrorist cells.

    You want a fight, President Bush? Let’s fight to wean ourselves off Middle East oil, through an energy policy that doesn’t simply serve the interests of Exxon and Mobil.

    Those are the battles that we need to fight. Those are the battles that we willingly join. The battles against ignorance and intolerance. Corruption and greed. Poverty and despair.

    The consequences of war are dire, the sacrifices immeasurable. We may have occasion in our lifetime to once again rise up in defense of our freedom, and pay the wages of war. But we ought not – we will not – travel down that hellish path blindly. Nor should we allow those who would march off and pay the ultimate sacrifice, who would prove the full measure of devotion with their blood, to make such an awful sacrifice in vain.

    Lets turn the page,

    VOTE OBAMA FOR PRESIDENT!

  5. Mark Says:
    February 7th, 2008 at 11:45 pm

    It is easier to speak out against the war when one is not yet a senator. IF he would have been in congress at the time of the vote and a senator for the state in which the attacks took place; we might have heard a different song from Mr. Obama.

  6. Fort Greene & Clinton Hill’s Congressman Sticking with Hillary « The Real Fort Greene Says:
    May 14th, 2008 at 12:42 pm

    […] the 10th Congressional District voted overwhelmingly for Senator Barack Obama (58% Obama, 42% Clinton), the district’s long-time Representative, Edolphus (Ed) Towns, continues to support Hillary […]

  7. apartmani zagreb Says:
    March 3rd, 2011 at 11:38 am

    Its like you read my mind! You appear to know a lot about this, like you wrote the book in it or something. I think that you could do with some pics to drive the message home a little bit, but instead of that, this is great blog. A fantastic read. I will certainly be back.

  8. Nathanial Fulena Says:
    November 6th, 2012 at 10:51 am

    This really is getting a bit more fuzy, but I much prefer the Zune Marketplace. The actual interface is vibrant, has more sparkle, and some cool features like ‘Mixview’ that let you swiftly see related cds, songs, or other consumers related to what you’re playing. Clicking on one of those will certainly center on that product, and another set of “neighbors” can come into view, enabling you to navigate around exploring by similar artists, songs, or people. Speaking of users, the Zune “Social” is also extreme fun, letting you find other folks with shared likes and becoming friends together. You then can listen to a playlist created according to an amalgamation of what all of your friends are playing, which is also enjoyable. People concerned with privacy is going to be relieved to know you’ll be able to prevent the public from seeing your personal being attentive habits if you therefore choose.

Gotham Gazette the Place for Politics and Policy

Gotham Gazette is published by Citizens Union Foundation and is made possible by support from the Robert Sterling Clark Foundation, the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation, the Altman Foundation,the Fund for the City of New York and donors to Citizens Union Foundation. Please consider supporting Citizens Union Foundation's public education programs. Critical early support to Gotham Gazette was provided by the Charles H. Revson Foundation, Rockefeller Brothers Fund and the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation.

RSS Feed