Recent Posts
NYC Blogs
Click here for a list of NYC blogs
Newsfeeds
Search This Blog

A New Congestion Bill
April 2nd, 2008

Brooklyn assemblyman and comptroller candidate Jim Brennan has introduced his own version of a congestion pricing bill — one that keeps the mayor’s previous in-zone charge and exempts drivers crossing the East River bridges that do not enter the congestion zone.

The bill, which consolidates the Bloomberg administration’s original proposal and aspects of the State Senate bill introduced last week, does not mirror what the City Council approved on Monday. This new proposal seems to point to some council members’ fear that they were voting on a draft proposal, not a final compromise between the state Assembly and the Senate.

Currently, Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver seems to be the final hurdle for the Bloomberg administration. Silver has not budged on the congestion pricing plan, stating that the City Council’s vote does not mandate the State Legislature to act. Home rule messages, Silver has said, do not get through Albany all the time.

This approach does not bode well with congestion pricing supporters, including the New York Times, which hosts an editorial today urging the speaker to move on the proposal.

Brennan’s full release after the jump:

State Assemblymember Jim Brennan (D Brooklyn) has introduced a congestion pricing bill. The new proposal takes a variety of ideas that have been advanced and blends them together to create a better plan, while dropping or changing several proposals advanced by the Traffic Mitigation Commission.

Key to this proposal involves authorizing congestion pricing as a three-year experiment, similar to the concept advanced by Mayor Bloomberg last summer. Authorizing the congestion pricing program as an experiment would assure that the MTA does not go into debt by selling bonds with congestion pricing revenue pledged toward the new debt, only to find that the program is unsuccessful in deterring traffic congestion. The congestion pricing revenue, estimated at $500 million per year, would still be directed to the MTA capital program.

The new bill retains two concepts advanced in the original Mayoral proposal from 2007. First, it would retain the $4 charge for auto trips originating within the zone. Short trips would be exempt. The proposal also only charges drivers crossing bridges and tunnels into Manhattan if they enter the zone. Under the Traffic Mitigation proposal just supported by the City Council, drivers who cross bridges and tunnels in to Manhattan but bypass the zone are still charged $8.

Another aspect of the Brennan bill would require full City Council approval of residential permit parking plans. This would assure that individual neighborhoods would not be able to create exclusive zones without the consent of all of the City governments elected representatives. New aspects of the Council-supported program, such as a Port Authority contribution, a low-income tax credit, and prevailing wage, are included in the proposal, as well as a new compliance requirement for the MTA for the States MWBE program.

By on April 2, 2008, 12:34 pm
In category: Albany,Environment,Gotham City,Health,Transportation | 1 Comment »

| More

RSS Feed RSS Feed


One Response to “A New Congestion Bill”

  1. Dave Duke Says:
    April 7th, 2008 at 9:41 pm

    I suggest charging large vehicles such as SUV’s a premoum at all bridge crossings when they enter the city. This could include trucks of all kinds. There is no reason to charge the extra fee to those with small vehicles…people who are already doing the right thing!

Gotham Gazette the Place for Politics and Policy

Gotham Gazette is published by Citizens Union Foundation and is made possible by support from the Robert Sterling Clark Foundation, the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation, the Altman Foundation,the Fund for the City of New York and donors to Citizens Union Foundation. Please consider supporting Citizens Union Foundation's public education programs. Critical early support to Gotham Gazette was provided by the Charles H. Revson Foundation, Rockefeller Brothers Fund and the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation.

RSS Feed