Recent Posts
NYC Blogs
Click here for a list of NYC blogs
Newsfeeds
Search This Blog

What the Plan Means
March 17th, 2009

Observers say that the Senate’s MTA plan means simply that Senate Majority Leader Malcolm Smith does not have control of his majority. The” gang of three,” including Sen. Pedro Espada, Jr., Ruben Diaz, Sr., and Carl Kruger, put their collective foot down against tolling East River bridges–and Smith had to capitulate.

Smith’s plan would enact four percent fare increases and a tax of 25 cents on every 100 dollars of payroll in counties served by the MTA. It does nothing for the MTA’s capital budget. Smith’s plan is a far cry from the Ravitch plan, which would have imposed $5 tolls on bridges over the East River, created a .33 percent payroll tax, and increased fares by about eight percent. The Senate plan also does far less to address the MTA’s financial problems than the $2-toll compromise plan presented by Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver earlier this year.

Smith insisted during a press conference this morning that he would not act on the capital plan until a full forensic audit of the MTA’s finances took place. “We dont want to have an AIG situation with the MTA,” said Smith. He told press members present that he would likely address the plan later in the year. Smith said he intended to make funding for Long Island and upstate roads a part of the capital plan.

Critics say these concerns are covers for Smith’s impotence as majority leader.

The Senate plan has been called a “stopgap measure” by Sheldon Silver, and MTA chairman Dale Hemmerdinger insisted at a press conference with Gov. David Paterson today that the Senate’s calculations were flawed. Hemmerdinger said that Smith’s plan is $1 billion short of plugging the MTA’s operating gap.

Gov. David Paterson said that he felt senators don’t grasp the gravity of the situation. He said the legislature needs to act now. “Pushing problems off into the future is going to only to accomplish what putting problems off into the future did in the 70s, which is creating all kinds of hardship.

Paterson said he would make himself available to all legislators to “urge them of the magnitude of this problem.” He also offered to meet with “both leaders” in the Senate to try to reach a consensus.

Transit advocates have been pushing for a bipartisan approach for months.

“We knew two weeks ago that the way out was to get bipartisan support in the Senate,” said Neysa Pranger of the Regional Plan Association.

Silver released a statement today saying, “I continue to believe that we must act now and that any viable solution must address both the immediate threat of a fare hike and service cuts and the long-term needs of our mass transit system.”

However, assemblymen who stand against tolls on the East River bridges say that this is a good start.

Assemblyman Jose Peralta said, “Any plan that doesnt have tolling is a much better plan.” He went on to note that the Senate plan is not “an end all” and “now it is a matter of sitting down and negotiating.”

By on March 17, 2009, 5:48 pm
In category: Albany,Eye on Albany,Transportation | 2 Comments »

| More

RSS Feed RSS Feed


2 Responses to “What the Plan Means”

  1. Denver Lotzer Says:
    March 17th, 2013 at 8:40 pm

    Aw, this was an incredibly good post. Taking the time and actual effort to make a really good article… but what can I say… I procrastinate a whole lot and never seem to get nearly anything done.

  2. Hassan Vanbergen Says:
    July 31st, 2013 at 11:26 am

    I actually wanted to jot down a brief word in order to say thanks to you for the great suggestions you are posting here. My extended internet research has finally been recognized with useful know-how to write about with my friends and family. I would say that most of us site visitors actually are quite fortunate to exist in a good place with so many special professionals with interesting tricks. I feel really blessed to have encountered your entire webpages and look forward to really more pleasurable moments reading here. Thanks a lot once more for a lot of things.

Leave a Reply

Gotham Gazette the Place for Politics and Policy

Gotham Gazette is published by Citizens Union Foundation and is made possible by support from the Robert Sterling Clark Foundation, the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation, the Altman Foundation,the Fund for the City of New York and donors to Citizens Union Foundation. Please consider supporting Citizens Union Foundation's public education programs. Critical early support to Gotham Gazette was provided by the Charles H. Revson Foundation, Rockefeller Brothers Fund and the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation.

RSS Feed