Recent Posts
NYC Blogs
Click here for a list of NYC blogs
Newsfeeds
Search This Blog

Dock Street Gets Committee Approval
June 4th, 2009

From Ericskiff

From Ericskiff

In a rare break from business as usual at the City Council, the Land Use Committee approved a mixed use development project in Dumbo this afternoon, which the local councilmember opposes.

Councilmember David Yassky, along with many other Dumbo residents, oppose the project, because they say it will taint the view of the Brooklyn Bridge and block the view of Manhattan for nearby residents. Support for the project, otherwise known as Dock Street Dumbo, is hinged on a guarantee from the developer to build a school on the site. The city will pay $1 dollar for the school property, but it has budgeted $42 million for its construction. The project will include 325 apartments — 65 will be affordable housing.

The City Council typically defers to the local member for how to vote on a land use item. In this case, Yassky opposes the project, while Council Speaker Christine Quinn supports it.

“The experience of walking over, driving over and biking over the Brooklyn Bridge will be changed,” said Yassky before today’s vote. “Might you regret approving this application? You might. I might bet that you will.”

The Land Use Committee approved the project by a vote of 17 to 4, with council members Eric Gioia, John Liu, Tony Avella and Charles Barron dissenting. Yassky is not a member of the committee.

Gioia and Yassky both questioned whether the city’s School Construction Authority, which determines where schools are built, gave preferential treatment to the developers, Two Trees Management, in order to give them an edge in the approval process. At today’s meeting, Gioia read aloud from an email, obtained through a freedom of information law request, between authority officials, which said the authority had no plans to construct schools in that area of Brooklyn, but should follow up on the construction of a school in the development so officials could say that the project “is such a good deal.”

Following the vote, Yassky suggested that the deal be investigated.

Those that supported the project said the property owner has a right to develop the area and could build a structure that is larger and denser than the one they have proposed, according to the area’s zoning.

“The minute somebody is building something nearby when it affects them personally, and I’m the same way, suddenly the bridge’s view is an issue,” said Councilmember Simcha Fedler, who voted for the project. “If it’s somebody who is living 10 blocks away, the view is not such a problem.”

The project will head to the full council next week.

By on June 4, 2009, 3:17 pm
In category: Governing,Housing,nextNY | 2 Comments »

| More

RSS Feed RSS Feed


2 Responses to “Dock Street Gets Committee Approval”

  1. Daniel Millstone Says:
    June 4th, 2009 at 5:17 pm

    The only way communities can defeat these Bloomberg-style development projects, in my view, is to reach out to New Yorkers who live elsewhere. So long as objections come from only one or two locales, developers will steam right over the rest of us. The people, divided will always be defeated.

  2. dentures Says:
    January 2nd, 2014 at 9:18 am

    It has the just like you discover my head! You appear to recognize a great deal concerning this, such as you published the ebook within it or something that is. I have faith that you just could possibly make use of a handful of Pct to push the solution house a little, nevertheless in addition to that, that is spectacular weblog. An excellent study. I’ll certainly come back.

Gotham Gazette the Place for Politics and Policy

Gotham Gazette is published by Citizens Union Foundation and is made possible by support from the Robert Sterling Clark Foundation, the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation, the Altman Foundation,the Fund for the City of New York and donors to Citizens Union Foundation. Please consider supporting Citizens Union Foundation's public education programs. Critical early support to Gotham Gazette was provided by the Charles H. Revson Foundation, Rockefeller Brothers Fund and the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation.

RSS Feed