Walmart Declines Hearing Invitation... Again
February 1st, 2011
This should come as no surprise, but Walmart once again will pass on testifying at a City Council hearing on Thursday.
In a letter dated today, Walmart’s Philip H. Serghini attempts to strike down anti-Walmart sentiments wafting through the City Council, arguing the retail giant is committed to healthy foods, diversity and jobs. But Serghini says he could not commit to attending the hearing, because the council is only focused on Walmart and ignores the impact of other big-box stores in the city. You can see his explanation below.
The joint hearing, however, does not appear to consider the impact of the hundreds of NYC stores operated by these companies; rather it focuses solely on Walmart. Since we have not announced a store for New York City, I respectfully suggest the committee first conduct a thoughtful examination of the existing impact of large grocers and retailers on small businesses in New York City before embarking on a hypothetical exercise.
For these reasons and more, we respectfully decline participation in the February 3rd hearing.
Should the committee decide to conduct the hearing in a more comprehensive manner, we would be happy to revisit our decision. In the interim, we do feel a responsibility to better inform the planned discussion and share some facts about the company that the committee can share with participants.
Earlier this year, Walmart kicked off a major marketing campaign to persuade New Yorkers to support a store within the five boroughs. They are sending out mailers, taking out radio ads and have launched a NYC-centric Web site to corral support.
So far, no one at the council is budgeting.
The full explanation from Walmart is below.By Courtney Gross on February 1, 2011, 5:54 pm
In category: Civil Rights, Community Development, Crime & Safety, Economy, Electoral Politics, Eye Opener, Gotham City, Governing, Land Use, Law, Measuring UP, Public Finance, Work and Labor, nextNY | No Comments »