Koppell Would Consider Motion to Discharge for Living Wage
May 11th, 2011
Councilmember Oliver Koppell told Gotham Gazette today he would consider triggering a rare council rule to bring his living wage bill to the floor should Council Speaker Christine Quinn choose to oppose it.
“I would consider it, yes,” said Koppell at the Emigrant Savings Bank. “I’m hoping it doesn’t come to that. I’m hoping to convince the speaker to support this or some version of this.”
Typically legislation does not move at the City Council unless it has earned the support of the speaker. Quinn refused to say this afternoon whether she would bring the legislation to the floor or when she would decide whether or not to support it.
The bill, which has strong backing from many of the city’s unions, would require city subsidized developers pay a living wage. The Bloomberg adminsitration does not support the measure. On Monday, the city Economic Development Corp. released a study claiming a wage mandate would stall development and reduce jobs in the five boroughs.
Koppell said today, “The assumptions of the mayor are more than questionable.”
Koppell’s bill has been stalled in committee for nearly a year, despite the fact it has garnered 30 sponsors.
At the beginning of Quinn’s tenure — and in the name of transparency — Quinn revised the council rules to make it easier to bring a bill to the floor if it was stalled in committee. A council member must get seven members to sign a memo to bring the bill to the floor. The full council then determines whether the legislation should have a formal vote.
This procedure is rarely ever used and is considered an affront to the speaker’s leadership.By Courtney Gross on May 11, 2011, 3:51 pm
In category: City Hall, Electoral Politics, Eye Opener, Gotham City, Governing, Land Use, Law, Measuring UP, Public Finance, Work and Labor, nextNY | 2 Comments »