The New York Post's War on Poverty
July 21st, 2008

Since Mayor Michael Bloomberg proposed changing the formula for calculating the federal poverty level, the New York Post editorial page has waged a steady campaign to discredit the idea – even questioning the notion of poverty itself.

No family of four could survive for a year in New York City on a total income of $26,138. Period.” the Post declared last week. The problem, the paper believes, is that any measurement of poverty fails to account for the reality of life in this town with its immigrants (legal or otherwise), its hustlers, its elderly, its huge student population – and, above all else, its pulsing underground economy.”

A few days later, columnist Heather McDonald wrotethat any thresholdforpoverty is a “relative measure.” “Under this definition, no general increase in affluence can ever eliminate ‘poverty’ or the need for a larger federal government to ‘cure’ it,” she writes.

And today, the paper warnsthat Bloomberg may be planning a”major expansion of government ‘antipoverty’ initiatives – a la John Lindsay 40 years ago.”

“He may fear that fewer and fewer New Yorkers these days are actually poor,” the Post concludes.

By on July 21, 2008, 10:26 am
In category: Economy,Social Services | Comments Off on The New York Post's War on Poverty

| More

RSS Feed RSS Feed

Comments are closed.

Gotham Gazette the Place for Politics and Policy

Gotham Gazette is published by Citizens Union Foundation and is made possible by support from the Robert Sterling Clark Foundation, the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation, the Altman Foundation,the Fund for the City of New York and donors to Citizens Union Foundation. Please consider supporting Citizens Union Foundation's public education programs. Critical early support to Gotham Gazette was provided by the Charles H. Revson Foundation, Rockefeller Brothers Fund and the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation.

RSS Feed