Krueger on Food Stamp Access
February 18th, 2009

State Sen. Liz Krueger issued a press release today decrying reports that the Bloomberg administration has declined to take advantage of a provision in the federal stimulus bill that overturns a 1996 rule that placed limitations on the length of time some citizens could receive food stamps.

Under the old rule, healthy people with no dependents were limited to three months worth of food stamps in a three year span. The New York Times reported this week that Bloomberg administration officials insisted they are not obligated to extend benefits to anyone not enrolled in the Work Experience Program, a workfare program that provides temporary jobs, usually in city agencies.

Krueger joined a chorus of advocates who say the city should not be limiting access to help that is available to those who need it, especially during times of economic crisis.
As food prices soar and the economy plummets, we need to use every option available to maximize benefits and support hungry New Yorkers, Krueger is quoted as saying in the release.
Krueger will be introducing legislation in the Senate that will mandate that the City and the state take full advantage of federal Food Stamp program waivers that allow increased participation in the Food Stamp program.

Here is the entire release:

Senator Liz Krueger Blasts City Policy Denying Access to Food Stamps

New YorkState Senator Liz Krueger criticized New York City for unnecessarily limiting access to food stamps for needy New Yorkers, and announced that she is introducing legislation (also introduced in the Assembly — A.04169) that will require the City and State to take full advantage of federal Food Stamp program waivers that allow increased participation in the Food Stamp program. As part of President Obama’s economic stimulus bill there was a provision to extend food stamp waivers for able-bodied adults. However, it is currently optional for the State and localities to participate in these waiver programs, and as reported in yesterday’s New York Times, the City is continuing to refuse this option.

“I applaud the President and Congress for increasing Food Stamp benefits as part of their efforts to jump start our economy and help states like New York deal with our severe economic burdens,” said Senator Krueger. “As food prices soar and the economy plummets, we need to use every option available to maximize benefits and support hungry New Yorkers.” Food Stamp benefits are 100% federally funded and are the most successful economic stimulus program available — every $1 in Food Stamps translates intoover $1.70 in economic activity in our local economy immediately.

However, under out-dated Federal rules, able bodied adults without children, who are willing to meet Food Stamp Program work requirements but cannot find sufficient employment or available training slots, cannot continue to receive food stamps for more than three months per year, unless the locality applies for afederal waiver. New York City does not currently use its option as a high unemployment jurisdiction to participate in this federal waiver program.

“It makes absolutely no sense for New York City to decline to participate in the federal waiver program,” said Senator Krueger. “The program costs the City no money and is a proven tool for stimulating economic growth. If New York City sticks to its outdated policy then New York’s hungry will continue to suffer and our economic crisis could very well be prolonged. Clearly in today’s economy it is unrealistic to expect every unemployed adult to find work within athree month period. These adults are not trying to avoid work, they just can’t find jobs in today’s economy.”

By requiring the City to participate in the waiver program and estimated 13,000more New Yorkers will become eligible for food stamps with no cost to the State or City.

Senator Krueger concluded, “Food Stamps are a win/win for our State. Every new dollar in Food Stamps is immediately spent in a neighborhood food store or green market, helps low-income families meet their nutritional needs, and creates jobs in both our urbancommunities and on our farms.”

By on February 18, 2009, 8:22 pm
In category: Albany,Economy,Eye on Albany,Gotham City,Social Services | 5 Comments »

| More

RSS Feed RSS Feed

5 Responses to “Krueger on Food Stamp Access”

  1. Daniel Millstone Says:
    February 19th, 2009 at 8:53 am

    I loathe to say it, but this dispute — in which I think Mr. Bloomberg is outrageously in the wrong– may be of smaller importance on the ground than it is on a policy level. The idea that our Billionaire Mayor should be snatching food assistance out of eligible people’s mouth’s is, of course, just appalling. In actual practice, though, I’ve seen and heard of unemployed people getting food stamps without being caught up in the nightmare minutia of WEP.

  2. Bob Says:
    February 21st, 2009 at 7:24 am

    Fall into line behind Obama Liz Krueger. Maybe he will throw you a bone for your political career if you carry water for him. Our city has been through the welfare mill already, we do not want to return to the days of extreme dependence on the government. And what is this about “soaring” food costs. Commodity prices are down and I don’t notice soaring costs on my grocery bill–but then I pay for it myself.
    You are just another windbag full of Democratic National Committee rhetoric.

  3. snowball Says:
    February 21st, 2009 at 8:55 am

    Are you as bent out of shape about the $45M to retrain obviously incompetent financial “professionals”?

    I know I’d like to have the security of a state-sponsored PEP behind me every time I screw the pooch.

    When does the champagne trickle-down again?

  4. Jerry Says:
    February 22nd, 2009 at 2:07 pm

    Dear Ms.Kruger:
    You had written:
    As food prices soar and the economy plummets, we need to use every option available to maximize benefits and support hungry New Yorkers.
    So,please, be known that one of options which is illegally not available is article 7USC2014(d)(12). The article requests to exclude COLA benefit (made annually on January 1)for SS beneficiaries. But NYC HRA administration annually reduces the food stamps amount for those people, illegally considering the COLA benefit as an income.
    COLA – cost of living adjustment.
    Please, press Bloomberg and Doar to execute the law.

  5. Administrator Says:
    February 23rd, 2009 at 4:26 pm

    Just a reminder: we’re here to disagree civilly. Comments that include profanity and direct personal attacks may be removed by site administrators.

Gotham Gazette the Place for Politics and Policy

Gotham Gazette is published by Citizens Union Foundation and is made possible by support from the Robert Sterling Clark Foundation, the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation, the Altman Foundation,the Fund for the City of New York and donors to Citizens Union Foundation. Please consider supporting Citizens Union Foundation's public education programs. Critical early support to Gotham Gazette was provided by the Charles H. Revson Foundation, Rockefeller Brothers Fund and the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation.

RSS Feed