More Parks, Less Parking
April 15th, 2009

As the Yankees set to play their first official regular season game in their new stadium, Gotham Gazette parks writer Anne Schwartz offers the following modest proposal to help the state budget. (For more on the delays in plans to replace parks in the Bronx, see her article, Yankee Stadium Is Opening, But Not the Parks.

The state is providing a capital subsidy of $65 million for the construction of four new parking garages for the new Yankee Stadium — more than the capital funding the state budget allocates next year for the entire state park system. (The garages are also receiving tax-exempt federal and state financing of $59.6 million.)

Three of the garages are either under construction or complete. The fourth is slated for Jerome Avenue and 161st Street, where the parks department built an interim synthetic turf baseball/soccer field and track for the community, pending the completion of replacements for the 22 acres of public athletic fields that were taken over for the new stadium.

The first partial replacement park - a football/soccer field ringed by a 400-meter track - should be finished this month. At that point, the interim field will make way for the fourth parking garage. Baseball teams in the neighborhood will have to wait for new fields until the old stadium is razed and a park is created on its footprint, two and a half years from now.

How necessary is all that parking for 81 days a year? (OK, plus a few more if the Yankees go into the post-season.) The stadium is served by two subway lines and a brand new Metro North station. Wouldnt taxpayer money be better spent on keeping afloat the mass transit systems essential to the functioning of the citys economy?

Why not at least postpone the construction of the last garage and leave a nice new playing field for the neighborhood kids?

By on April 15, 2009, 8:34 pm
In category: Albany,Parks,Public Finance,sustainability,Transportation | 1 Comment »

| More

RSS Feed RSS Feed

One Response to “More Parks, Less Parking”

  1. Janet Says:
    April 15th, 2009 at 9:31 pm

    City government talks a lot about the need to encourage physical activity among young people. This is a proposal which could actually do something about it.
    While it is claimed that the considerable amount of parkland in Mullaly and Macombs Dam Parks which was taken will be replaced, that plan–offering parkland blocks and blocks away–reflects a flawed understanding of how most city kids live their lives, playing close to their homes because they travel by foot. It is evident to this writer that this plan was made and approved by the car-dependent, who expect all kids to be taken by automobile from home to their ballgames. Even after the old stadium is demolished, this parkland should stay.

Gotham Gazette the Place for Politics and Policy

Gotham Gazette is published by Citizens Union Foundation and is made possible by support from the Robert Sterling Clark Foundation, the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation, the Altman Foundation,the Fund for the City of New York and donors to Citizens Union Foundation. Please consider supporting Citizens Union Foundation's public education programs. Critical early support to Gotham Gazette was provided by the Charles H. Revson Foundation, Rockefeller Brothers Fund and the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation.

RSS Feed