A New Randall's Island Plan
April 21st, 2009

<i>From the Randall's Island Sports Foundation</i>

From the Randall's Island Sports Foundation

More than 50 residents turned out in East Harlem last night to hear the details of the Bloomberg administration’s new plan for Randall’s Island.

But already many are skeptical that the mayor’s office and the Department of Parks and Recreation’s plan will more equitably distribute the 66 fields on the island for recreational activities. The fields are part of a large scale renovation of the whole island, which started in 2007, and were also the subject of a lawsuit that the city lost last year. Several Upper Manhattan residents and parks advocates charged that the city went around the ULURP process (or the uniform land use review process), which, they argued, should have been required before the renovation took place.

The city’s first plan — which has been struck down by the courts — slated about two-thirds of the island’s fields for private school use exclusively. Those private schools had agreed to fork over $45 million for the cost of the fields construction and renovation.

Last night was the first glimpse into the city’s new proposal for many of those that filed the initial lawsuit.

The new plan includes setting aside 50 percent of the fields for certain private school use, 40 percent for public schools (which would include a possible shuttle expansion to bring more schools onto the island to play baseball, soccer or any other sport) and leaves 10 percent for community organizations or recreational leagues. This ratio would only apply during the hours of 3 p.m. and 6 p.m., and for only certain more sports-heavy months of the year. The summer months would be a permit free-for-all, said members of the administration, which would allow anyone, anywhere to apply for a permit.

The issue has been a serious one for Councilmember Melissa Mark Viverito, Borough President Scott Stringer and Comptroller William Thompson, who all hosted the event.

Some advocates already are threatening to oppose the new plan. Critics contend the city still needs to conduct an environmental impact statement and go through the land use review process.

“I’m embarrassed that the city is putting anything forth in a pay to play action,” said Geoffrey Croft, president of New York City Parks Advocates. “This project has managed to avoid every environmental review.”

A representative from the mayor’s office said the department had conducted an environmental analysis, but was not required to go through the land use procedure because the area had already been parkland and its use was not changing.

Others criticized the administration for not more actively engaging with the community, especially in East Harlem, where residents have used the island for recreational and non-recreational use for decades. Many want to ensure those from the community get first priority. So far, it does not appear that that is likely. The administration does have a grandfather policy that would allow some of the groups that have used the island for many years to continue to do so.

Officials who hosted the event assured the crowd that last night’s meeting would be one of many dedicated to hashing out any differences the community had with the administration.

By on April 21, 2009, 4:52 pm
In category: Gotham City,Land Use,nextNY,Parks | 12 Comments »

| More

RSS Feed RSS Feed

12 Responses to “A New Randall's Island Plan”

  1. Kieva Says:
    April 22nd, 2009 at 6:58 am

    Another meeting about this issue? How many have their been? The elected officials are just getting shoved around by RISF and their former Board Member, Michael Bloomberg. I run along the river, and Gracie Mansion, and can’t get there for half the year because the pedestrian bridge is raised and inaccessible.

  2. RayRay Says:
    April 29th, 2009 at 12:28 pm

    I like the article. But what they are doing with Randall’s Island is a shame. I grew up fishing and playing there in the woods. Now, the paths are nice, but all the artificial turf? It is so bad.

  3. Waldo Burich Says:
    April 29th, 2010 at 3:47 pm

    Really like reading your post. Perhaps artificial lawn info should help someone there.

  4. Cheap UGG Classic Tall Metallic Boots Says:
    September 29th, 2011 at 6:41 am

    Does your website have a contact page? I’m having problems locating it but, I’d like to shoot you an e-mail. I’ve got some recommendations for your blog you might be interested in hearing. Either way, great website and I look forward to seeing it grow over time.

  5. hunter wellies boots Says:
    January 7th, 2012 at 1:15 pm

    It¡¯s your pity you actually don¡¯t have got a contribute switch! I¡¯d most definitely contribute to that remarkable blog site! I actually suppose that for the moment i¡¯ll happy with book-marking plus incorporating a person¡¯s Rss so that you can this Bing akun. I actually glance forth so that you can fresh improvements but will show the following blog site by using this Twitter crew:

  6. Debbie Schoppe Says:
    March 20th, 2012 at 2:57 am

    Many thanks for useful post. I ‘m pleased sure this post has helped me save a lot of hours of browsing other similar posts just to find what I was looking for. Just I want to say: Thank you!

    April 27th, 2012 at 3:56 am

    Fuck… I miss when music was good and original.. /watch?v=IHeQbnCbOOE

  8. reisen last minute Says:
    May 12th, 2012 at 2:09 pm

    Some times your one post can change life of readers because your post are awesome.

  9. Versie Morello Says:
    June 10th, 2012 at 8:59 am

    Outstanding article. I most certainly enjoy the site. Keep writing!

  10. IT support Chelmsford Says:
    July 16th, 2012 at 9:35 pm

    Many thanks for the insightful article. I found it very informative, keep up the good posts!

  11. meeting rooms London Says:
    July 29th, 2012 at 11:24 pm

    Thanks for the fantastic post. I found it really insightful, keep up the great posts!

  12. google adwords qualified individual certification Says:
    February 10th, 2013 at 11:07 am

    Very nice job

Gotham Gazette the Place for Politics and Policy

Gotham Gazette is published by Citizens Union Foundation and is made possible by support from the Robert Sterling Clark Foundation, the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation, the Altman Foundation,the Fund for the City of New York and donors to Citizens Union Foundation. Please consider supporting Citizens Union Foundation's public education programs. Critical early support to Gotham Gazette was provided by the Charles H. Revson Foundation, Rockefeller Brothers Fund and the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation.

RSS Feed