The Manhattan Project's Legacy on Staten Island
June 4th, 2009

(This post was reported and written by Melissa Checker.)

Last week, I reported on the “toxic stew” surrounding Staten Islands North Shore. (For that article, go here.) That story was scary enough, but information obtained over the past week reveals that the scenario is actually much worse than initially reported. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency document reveal that a former warehouse on the North Shore played a significant part in the Manhattan Project — a role that went terribly awry, leaving levels of radium and uranium contamination nearly 10 times higher than allowable standards in some places.

Click here for the full story.

The 4 to 4.5 acre site sits on shore of the Dolan Transportation Services, is a deteriorating paved parking lot and storage area for trucks and other large vehicles. The site is surrounded by an eight-foot high chain link fence on the three sides that do not border the Kill Van Kull. Yet, according to the Environmental Protection Agency, “ardent” trespassers, boaters on the shipping channel and site workers could potentially access the site. Today, the only warning signs around it are No trespassing signs posted on the fence. I call [the site] You too can glow in the dark,'” said Dee Vanderberg of the Staten Island Taxpayers Association.

Staten Islands Manhattan Project
From 1939 to 1942, Archer Daniels Midlands Co. agreed to use a portion of their linseed oil manufacturing property on Staten Island to store 1,200 tons of high-grade uranium ore mined in what was then the Belgian Congo. The uranium, purchased from African Metals Corp., was to be used in building the atomic bomb. However, at some point (either during initial delivery or eventual shipment), uranium spilled on the waterfront property.

In 1980, the U.S. Department of Energy conducted a limited, surface-level survey of the area and identified a 20-by-40 meter area that was radiologically contaminated. However, in 1986 they determined the site was ineligible for their Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program. Because the energy department never owned the uranium, the agency determined that is has no authority for the contamination.

Assessing the Dangers
Twelve years later, in 1992, the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation conducted another assessment, this time of subsurface soil. It found the soil below the surface was far more radioactive than the surface samples studied by the energy department. Yet for reasons as yet unknown, no action was taken.

In February 2008 at the request of local citizens, the state asked the Environmental Protection Agency to re-evaluate contamination at the Richmond Terrace site. On Feb. 20, 2008, the federal and state environmental agencies and the New York City health department conducted a joint assessment of the site, which revealed levels of contamination approximately two orders of magnitude greater than the levels initially reported in 1980.

Because the site is also located within a 100-year flood plain, the Environmental Protection Agency believes that, in the event of a flood, there would be “a high tendency” for the material to migrate into the adjacent Kill Van Kull and Newark Bay. Moreover, the agency’s report states that although the area is currently fenced, trespassers coming either by land or water and site workers could “receive an unacceptable cancer risk under a conservative hypothetical risk assessment scenario.”

The analysis is frightening enough, but the severe weather and increased flooding brought on by climate change makes it that much more terrifying.

Early this year, the Environmental Protection Agency sent a letter to the energy department requesting that it reconsider the property for inclusion under its remedial action program. It also recommended that the energy department do another search for a responsible party at this point, that would be either African Metals Corp. or Archer Daniels Midland. Finally, the agency stated that if the first two recommendations did not come to fruition, it would consider taking at least a limited action to further protect public health concerns at the site.

As of today — June 4, 2009 — North Shore residents are still waiting for answers.

By on June 4, 2009, 2:28 pm
In category: Albany,Environment,Gotham City,sustainability,Waterfront | 10 Comments »

| More

RSS Feed RSS Feed

10 Responses to “The Manhattan Project's Legacy on Staten Island”

  1. buy edu backlinks Says:
    January 12th, 2012 at 5:17 pm

    Youre so cool! I dont suppose Ive learn something like this before. So good to seek out anyone with some authentic thoughts on this subject. realy thanks for beginning this up. this website is something that’s wanted on the web, somebody with a bit originality. useful job for bringing something new to the web!

  2. news Says:
    January 16th, 2012 at 6:32 pm

    Thanks for the article. I have continually seen that almost all people are desirous to lose weight since they wish to look slim along with attractive. Nevertheless, they do not often realize that there are other benefits to losing weight additionally. Doctors insist that fat people experience a variety of health conditions that can be perfectely attributed to the excess weight. The great thing is that people that are overweight as well as suffering from a variety of diseases can reduce the severity of the illnesses by losing weight. It is easy to see a constant but noted improvement with health while even a negligible amount of fat reduction is reached.

  3. Jaime Says:
    April 2nd, 2012 at 8:28 pm

    Hi there, really unique points dealing with signs etc. You’ll could keep writing about it all?

  4. Globalist Agenda Says:
    May 17th, 2012 at 8:01 am

    I do not find out about you, but I think these Globalists have gotten progressively more efficient every day. We have to prevent the Globalists and their evil Globalist Agenda. The Globalist Agenda is actual and also you have to learn about it.

  5. Henry Says:
    May 3rd, 2013 at 8:35 pm

    Hi there would you mind letting me know which webhost you’re using? I’ve loaded your blog in 3 completely different internet browsers and I must say this blog loads a lot quicker then most. Can you recommend a good web hosting provider at a reasonable price? Thanks a lot, I appreciate it!|

  6. Jared Lanford Says:
    May 30th, 2013 at 7:55 pm

  7. тапочки купить Says:
    August 8th, 2013 at 6:22 am

    obviously like your website however you need to take a look at the spelling on quite a few of your posts. Many of them are rife with spelling problems and I in finding it very troublesome to tell the truth nevertheless I will surely come again again.

  8. gaming Says:
    November 2nd, 2013 at 2:07 am

    I think the admin of this web page is truly working hard in favor of his web site, for the reason that here
    every material is quality based stuff.

    Also visit my web blog :: gaming

  9. Calvin Says:
    November 8th, 2013 at 12:12 pm

    Hey There. I found your blog using msn. This is a really well written article.

    I will be sure to bookmark it and return to read more of
    your useful info. Thanks for the post. I’ll certainly

  10. mobile games Says:
    April 11th, 2014 at 10:03 am

    Yesterday, while I was at work, my sister stole my iPad and tested to see if it can
    survive a twenty five foot drop, just so she can be a youtube sensation.
    My apple ipad is now broken and she has 83 views. I know this is
    completely off topic but I had to share it with someone!

RSS Feed