Actual Innocence Act
December 22nd, 2009

Sen. Eric Schneiderman and Assemblyman Adriano Espaillat seem to share at least one New Year’s resolution–they both hope to pass legislation that would give the wrongfully convicted a chance to prove their innocence and vacate their conviction.

Both legislators were joined today by a number of civil rights groups as well as Fernando Bermudez to announce their support for the legislation.

Bermudez served 18 years in prison for a murder he didn’t commit before a judge dismissed the indictment against him this past November. A witness in Bermudez’s case was found to have lied in court.

Fernandos experience illustrates exactly why we need to reform the criminal justice system to give innocent people locked up in prison a hearing when they can produce evidence conclusively proving they are not guilty,” said Schneiderman. “Its that simple. Had this law been in place in the 1990s, its possible that Mr. Bermudez could have been a free man more than ten years ago.”

The “Actual Innoncence Act’ is co-sponsored by Sen. Thomas Duane, Sen. Velmanette Montgomery and has been endorsed by the New York Civil Liberties Union and the Exoneration Initiative.

Here is the statement from Schneiderman’s office:

“For wrongfully convicted individuals in these non-DNA cases, current law offers only limited hope for relief by establishing procedural obstacles that can deprive them of having an innocence claim thoroughly heard. The tragic result as demonstrated in hundreds of DNA exoneration cases throughout the country is that an innocent person can spend years in jail while the real perpetrator is free to commit more crimes and terrorize countless victims.

The Schneiderman-Espaillat bill (S.5234) creates a freestanding ground of actual innocence upon which a criminal court could grant a post-conviction motion to vacate its prior judgment of conviction. The motion can be granted only where a defendant is able to present reliable and relevant proof that conclusively establishes the defendants actual innocence of the crime of which he or she was convicted. To ensure that a defendant cannot benefit from prior inaction or delay aimed at gaming the system, the bill would specifically permit the court to deny relief where it determines that the defendants failure to act was intentional.

This bill prevents the rejection of innocence claims on technicalities. It is particularly important in cases like this one, where there is no DNA evidence. In the last five years, approximately 64 percent of all the exonerations in the United States were based on non-DNA evidence. Experts observe that the percentage of exonerations based on non-DNA evidence in New York State is only increasing.”

By on December 22, 2009, 2:07 pm
In category: Albany,Eye on Albany | 3 Comments »

| More

RSS Feed RSS Feed

3 Responses to “Actual Innocence Act”

  1. Vicente Michelli Says:
    August 14th, 2012 at 10:15 am

    I saw this article and its really good. Well done. ;) Vicente Michelli

  2. KRYSTIAN Says:
    February 19th, 2013 at 8:11 am

    How much sand in the sea as the stars in the sky, so much happiness and a boy who wishes for you!

  3. Donnell Rodriguez Says:
    May 8th, 2013 at 10:27 am

    But great mobile site: D I’ll check back here: D Regards! :-)

Gotham Gazette the Place for Politics and Policy

Gotham Gazette is published by Citizens Union Foundation and is made possible by support from the Robert Sterling Clark Foundation, the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation, the Altman Foundation,the Fund for the City of New York and donors to Citizens Union Foundation. Please consider supporting Citizens Union Foundation's public education programs. Critical early support to Gotham Gazette was provided by the Charles H. Revson Foundation, Rockefeller Brothers Fund and the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation.

RSS Feed